Those Who Sacrifice Liberty for Security Deserve Neither

by | May 20, 2015 | Blog, Criminal Law, News

12647341_sAs mentioned in the boater’s rights blog, the New Jersey State Constitution provides the ceiling of our rights, while the United States Constitution provides the floor.  Put another way, police in all 50 states cannot violate the rights protected by the federal constitution, while individual states are free to either lock-step with federal constitution case law or provide individual state citizens with even greater rights (but never less rights).  Thankfully, New Jersey has a history that favors individual liberty over crime control.  Therefore, our Supreme Court has not been afraid to occasionally go above and beyond the minimum of individual rights guaranteed federal constitution.  This approach is consistent with Benjamin Franklin’s statement that ”Those Who Sacrifice Liberty For Security Deserve Neither.”With that in mind, it is imperative for a criminal defense attorney to stay on top the latest New Jersey state court opinions.  But there is also value in reviewing the United State Supreme Court opinions.  Oftentimes the United States Supreme Court addresses an issue that the New Jersey state courts have not yet addressed.  Moreover, even a dissenting federal Supreme Court opinion, i.e. an  opinion of the minority of Justices, becomes the inspiration for a subsequent New Jersey state court opinion.

Recently, I read  Yates v. United States, decided on February 25, 2015.  It was my first time reading an opinion from of our newest member of the United States Supreme Court, Justice Elena Kagan.  I was struck not only by her beautiful writing style, but by how scathing her dissent was in the Yates case.  She seemed to go out of her way to lambaste the concurring opinion of Justice Alito.

Justice Kagan’s dissent reminded me of the controversy surrounding Justice Alito’s confirmation hearing.  In particular, I recall one of the U.S. Senators grilling him about a dissent that he authored as a federal appellate judge.  In that case, Doe v. Groody, Alito opined that police officers were immune from civil liability after they conducted a warrantless strip search of a suspected drug dealer’s wife and ten year old daughter.

Excellent rating
Based on 288 reviews
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Highly professional The lawyer Frederick is a serious and professional person, he helped me a lot in my case, I recommend him a lot to help you too, he is always in contact with you explaining the process, a very patient and kind person.
Ca
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Mr. Sisto and his entire staff were courteous, professional and got our case handled quickly and to the best outcome. Great lawyer. Highly recommend.
Bryan B
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Mr. Fred Sisto is really an amazing attorney! Professional, knowledgeable, and effective. He made me feel comfortable in knowing he was working countless hours on my case to get me the best possible outcome. Mr. Sisto was very responsive and kept me updated with all court proceedings/updates. I am thankful to have had him represent me. I will be recommending Mr. Sisto & his firm to anyone in need. Thanks again ! Much Appreciated
Javier B
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred Sisto is very responsive, courteous, and he really knows what he's doing. I highly recommend Fred.
Kenneth L
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Great that Fred posts DUI for Monmouth County!
David F
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Mr. Sisto provides outstanding support and guidance, he is absolutely very quick to respond to your initial inquiry and stands by you throughout your legal circumstances. I highly recommend Mr. Sisto to assist you in your time of need! You will truly be thankful you used his expertise and services!
Ej W
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Very good
Nazario B
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Spot on, 100%
Earl M
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred was great and very reasonable. He was extremely easy to get ahold of or very quick to return my calls. I was able to get my charge dropped altogether. I highly recommend Fred!
Jasmine C
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Great lawyer. Got the best results for me. Very responsive!
Kathleen S