Those Who Sacrifice Liberty for Security Deserve Neither

by | May 20, 2015 | Blog, Criminal Law, News

12647341_sAs mentioned in the boater’s rights blog, the New Jersey State Constitution provides the ceiling of our rights, while the United States Constitution provides the floor.  Put another way, police in all 50 states cannot violate the rights protected by the federal constitution, while individual states are free to either lock-step with federal constitution case law or provide individual state citizens with even greater rights (but never less rights).  Thankfully, New Jersey has a history that favors individual liberty over crime control.  Therefore, our Supreme Court has not been afraid to occasionally go above and beyond the minimum of individual rights guaranteed federal constitution.  This approach is consistent with Benjamin Franklin’s statement that ”Those Who Sacrifice Liberty For Security Deserve Neither.”With that in mind, it is imperative for a criminal defense attorney to stay on top the latest New Jersey state court opinions.  But there is also value in reviewing the United State Supreme Court opinions.  Oftentimes the United States Supreme Court addresses an issue that the New Jersey state courts have not yet addressed.  Moreover, even a dissenting federal Supreme Court opinion, i.e. an  opinion of the minority of Justices, becomes the inspiration for a subsequent New Jersey state court opinion.

Recently, I read  Yates v. United States, decided on February 25, 2015.  It was my first time reading an opinion from of our newest member of the United States Supreme Court, Justice Elena Kagan.  I was struck not only by her beautiful writing style, but by how scathing her dissent was in the Yates case.  She seemed to go out of her way to lambaste the concurring opinion of Justice Alito.

Justice Kagan’s dissent reminded me of the controversy surrounding Justice Alito’s confirmation hearing.  In particular, I recall one of the U.S. Senators grilling him about a dissent that he authored as a federal appellate judge.  In that case, Doe v. Groody, Alito opined that police officers were immune from civil liability after they conducted a warrantless strip search of a suspected drug dealer’s wife and ten year old daughter.

Excellent rating
Based on 288 reviews
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Mr. Sisto was not only a knowledgeable and excellent lawyer, he was compassionate and understanding during this difficult time. I found Mr. Sisto to always be available and he services were affordable and effective. You will not find a better lawyer.
Joseph S
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Estoy realmente satisfecho con el excelente trabajo que hizo el abogo en mi caso de DIU. Agradecido por que el caso fue un éxito, ya que además tiene mucho conocimiento en estos casos y no dudo que en otros casos también. Lo recomiendo totalmente.
Luis A
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
For the people. For the little guy My legal bully
Glennlykesmusic
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Great location
John G
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Current Pre law students and I had a question pertaining to a certain scenario in class. He responded back and gave me a case that broke down exactly what I asked for.
Chad T
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Very knowledgeable with expungement!!! Thanks again!!!
Nicole B
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Called back within 10 minutes,very easy to talk to. Not judgmental at all. I am hopeful about the outcome.
Colleen H
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
On time and on point. Very knowledgeable
Ron T
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Mr. Sisto and his entire staff were courteous, professional and got our case handled quickly and to the best outcome. Great lawyer. Highly recommend.
Bryan B
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I am writing to share my experience working with Fred From the very beginning, he provided outstanding service and demonstrated a high level of professionalism. He was attentive to my needs, communicated clearly, and always made sure I understood each step of the process. What impressed me most was his efficiency—he handled my case quickly without compromising on quality. His dedication and expertise gave me confidence and peace of mind throughout the entire process. I highly recommend Fred to anyone seeking reliable and effective legal support. His commitment to his clients and ability to deliver results promptly truly set him apart.
Aida F