Those Who Sacrifice Liberty for Security Deserve Neither

by | May 20, 2015 | Blog, Criminal Law, News

12647341_sAs mentioned in the boater’s rights blog, the New Jersey State Constitution provides the ceiling of our rights, while the United States Constitution provides the floor.  Put another way, police in all 50 states cannot violate the rights protected by the federal constitution, while individual states are free to either lock-step with federal constitution case law or provide individual state citizens with even greater rights (but never less rights).  Thankfully, New Jersey has a history that favors individual liberty over crime control.  Therefore, our Supreme Court has not been afraid to occasionally go above and beyond the minimum of individual rights guaranteed federal constitution.  This approach is consistent with Benjamin Franklin’s statement that ”Those Who Sacrifice Liberty For Security Deserve Neither.”With that in mind, it is imperative for a criminal defense attorney to stay on top the latest New Jersey state court opinions.  But there is also value in reviewing the United State Supreme Court opinions.  Oftentimes the United States Supreme Court addresses an issue that the New Jersey state courts have not yet addressed.  Moreover, even a dissenting federal Supreme Court opinion, i.e. an  opinion of the minority of Justices, becomes the inspiration for a subsequent New Jersey state court opinion.

Recently, I read  Yates v. United States, decided on February 25, 2015.  It was my first time reading an opinion from of our newest member of the United States Supreme Court, Justice Elena Kagan.  I was struck not only by her beautiful writing style, but by how scathing her dissent was in the Yates case.  She seemed to go out of her way to lambaste the concurring opinion of Justice Alito.

Justice Kagan’s dissent reminded me of the controversy surrounding Justice Alito’s confirmation hearing.  In particular, I recall one of the U.S. Senators grilling him about a dissent that he authored as a federal appellate judge.  In that case, Doe v. Groody, Alito opined that police officers were immune from civil liability after they conducted a warrantless strip search of a suspected drug dealer’s wife and ten year old daughter.

Excellent rating
Based on 288 reviews
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Mr. Sisto and his entire staff were courteous, professional and got our case handled quickly and to the best outcome. Great lawyer. Highly recommend.
Bryan B
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I got my life back together because of this man he is quick,strategic,and will get you threw almost any criminal matter.When things are looking rough legal wise he will fight for you…FRED SISTO THE WAY TO GO!!!
Byron P
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Worst Attorney I have ever encountered he will WASTE your time and steal your MONEY. Don't RECOMMEND!
Patric W
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Very knowledgeable with expungement!!! Thanks again!!!
Nicole B
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Professional, knowledgeable and responsive. I would highly recommend Fritz to any friend or family members.
William S
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Nice to know where to avoid,I drive a taxi and can save time if I know where they are because they tie up traffic.
John M
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred is a good lawyer, he is really young yet made me feel confident that my lawful rights were being protected, and investigated all avenues when there was potential they weren't. He is very knowledgeable, and offered great peace of mind in such a distressing situation. I always felt like he had my back throughout the whole process, supporting aspects to my case that didn't even fall within his scope. I would highly recommend Fred.
Amy L
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Mr Sisto is an excellent lawyer. The tickets I received were nothing compared to the charges i had originally. I got the best possible outcome for my case, and Mr Sisto was incredibly understanding and patient and responded to any questions I had within about 30 minutes of me asking them. I'll be going to him again for any legal trouble I have in the future
Brandon K
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred Sisto is an excellent attorney who works diligently and thoroughly to support, advise, and guide you through your legal difficulties. He is down-to-earth, advises you well, and his cost is comparable and well-worth it based on the service and expertise that he provides. Fred was able to get me the best possible outcome for my situation based on the possibilities and he was direct and honest with me throughout the process. John McDonnell
John M
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred Sisto is amazing!! Definitely recommend
Jen A