Fred Sisto | Criminal Attorney | Ocean and Monmouth County

Call Us Today
732-898-3232

  • Home
  • Criminal Defense Services
    ▼
    • Drug Crimes
      ▼
      • Drug Manufacturing
      • Intent to Distribute Narcotics
      • Prescription Drug Crimes
      • Leader of Narcotics Trafficking Network
    • Weapons Charges
      ▼
      • Prohibited Weapons and Devices
      • Manufacture, Transport, etc. of Weapons
      • Illegal Possession of a Gun
      • Possession of Weapons for Unlawful Purposes
    • Expungements
    • Theft Attorney
    • Violent Crimes
      ▼
      • Robbery/Burglary
      • Manslaughter
      • Extortion
      • Assault
      • Sexual Offenses
    • Arson
    • DUI / DWI
      ▼
      • Alcohol DUI
      • Drug DUI
      • Refusing a Breath Test
    • Driving with A Suspended License
    • Property Forfeiture
    • Anti-Drug Profiteering
    • Juvenile Delinquency
  • Español / Spanish Speaking Attorney
  • About
    ▼
    • Testimonials
    • Defending Cases In
      ▼
      • Monmouth County
      • Ocean County
  • Blog
  • Contact
    ▼
    • Receive a Call From Fred
  • DUI Checkpoint Alerts
  • Results
  • Payment Options
  • Home
  • Criminal Defense Services
    • Drug Crimes
      • Drug Manufacturing
      • Intent to Distribute Narcotics
      • Prescription Drug Crimes
      • Leader of Narcotics Trafficking Network
    • Weapons Charges
      • Prohibited Weapons and Devices
      • Manufacture, Transport, etc. of Weapons
      • Illegal Possession of a Gun
      • Possession of Weapons for Unlawful Purposes
    • Expungements
    • Theft Attorney
    • Violent Crimes
      • Robbery/Burglary
      • Manslaughter
      • Extortion
      • Assault
      • Sexual Offenses
    • Arson
    • DUI / DWI
      • Alcohol DUI
      • Drug DUI
      • Refusing a Breath Test
    • Driving with A Suspended License
    • Property Forfeiture
    • Anti-Drug Profiteering
    • Juvenile Delinquency
  • Español / Spanish Speaking Attorney
  • About
    • Testimonials
    • Defending Cases In
      • Monmouth County
      • Ocean County
  • Blog
  • Contact
    • Receive a Call From Fred
  • DUI Checkpoint Alerts
  • Results
  • Payment Options
Home >> Warrantless Home Entries: Unreasonable Search & Seizure

March 19, 2017 by Fred Sisto

Warrantless Home Entries: Unreasonable Search & Seizure

Warrantless Home EntryThe Legette Court continued:

Both the Federal and New Jersey State Constitutions guarantee the right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. Accordingly, a lawful search must be prefaced by a warrant obtained upon probable cause unless the search falls within one of the few well-delineated exceptions to the warrant requirement. If no warrant was sought, the State bears the burden of demonstrating the validity of the search. The State’s burden is particularly heavy when the search is conducted after warrantless entry into a home, because the home bears a special status. This case requires the Court to determine whether the public safety concerns underpinning investigatory stops can overcome the special status accorded to the home.

Because the reasonable suspicion necessary to justify an investigatory stop is a lower standard than the probable cause necessary to sustain an arrest, there are certain limitations on the scope of such stops. The Court has held that the investigative methods employed in a Terry stop should be the least intrusive means reasonably available to verify or dispel the officer’s suspicion in a short period of time. Because officers are limited to taking self-protective measures during investigatory stops, the Court finds that Chrisman and Bruzzese do not support warrantless entries into detainees’ homes and declines to expand the scope of investigatory stops to encompass police entry into the home.

Here, the officer failed to conduct a routine investigatory pat-down before entering the apartment, which belied the concern for safety. The Court notes that it is irrelevant whether the officer had probable cause to effectuate an arrest based on the smell of marijuana; the inquiry under Chrisman and Bruzzese is whether Legette had been arrested when the officer followed him into the apartment. Finally, the State did not show that Legette thought he could refuse entry into his apartment, so the Court does not find that the search was consensual. Because the State failed to meet its burden of demonstrating that the search in this case fell within a recognized exception to the warrant requirement, the entry was illegal and the evidence obtained as a result of that entry should have been suppressed.

In dissenting, Justice Solomon, a former Camden County Prosecutor, expressed the view that the officer had probable cause to arrest Legette because he smelled burned marijuana, that his decision to accompany Legette rather than immediately arrest him was reasonable, that this accompaniment did not vitiate the probable cause, and that the same policy concerns for officer safety that apply to arrestees also apply to detainees. In Justice Solomon’s view, the officer’s decision to allow Legette to retrieve identification rather than immediately place him under arrest mirrors the facts of Chrisman, and Chrisman is equally applicable to pre-arrest situations as to post-arrest situations.

Note that Justice Solomon described what was likely an order for the defendant to get his id as a “decision to allow Legette to retrieve identification.” In so doing, Justice Solomon ignores the logic that an individual with contraband hidden on his person would be looking to avoid the police, as opposed to encouraging additional interaction by retrieving and turning over his identification under circumstances in which he was not required to provide an i.d.

Filed Under: Blog, Criminal Law, New Jersey, Warrants Tagged With: Criminal Law

Testimonials

Fred is a stickler for detail and communicates with clients very, very well. He is smart and astute. I would recommend him unconditionally.

Tom O   

I would highly recommend Mr. Sisto. He is very insightful and proficient, yet still down to Earth. Fred is great at communicating and breaking down the facts. But most importantly, he excels at getting results.

Bill K   

Thanks to Fred I have no criminal record whatsoever.

Luke A   

Great!!! , got my case handled in the exact manner that I was told and would recommend to everyone else in need of legal representation.

Raumelis R   
See More Testimonials

Recent Posts

  • Marijuana and Diversionary Programs (Part 4)
  • Marijuana and Diversionary Programs (Part 3)
  • Marijuana and Diversionary Programs (Part 2)
  • Marijuana and Diversionary Programs (Part 1)
  • Jurisdiction and Subsequent Prosecutions (Part 2)
  • Jurisdiction and Subsequent Prosecutions (Part 1)
  • Statutes of Limitations and DNA Evidence (Part 3)
  • Statutes of Limitations and DNA Evidence (Part 2)

Recent Speaking Engagement

Site Disclaimer

Attorney Referral Fees

Frederick P Sisto has earned Lawyer Legion's recognition for Community Leadership
 
Top Criminal Defense Attorney in Brick

Law Office of Frederick P. Sisto

Point Pleasant Office*:
302 Hawthorne Ave, Suite 1
Point Pleasant Beach, NJ 08742

Brick Township Office*:
223 Drum Point Road, Suite 1
Brick Township, NJ 08723

Sea Girt Office*:
2150 NJ-35,
Suite 225
Sea Girt, NJ 08750

Phone: 732-898-3232
Fax: 201-508-3393
*Office visits by appointment only.

Representing clients throughout all court jurisdictions of New Jersey.

WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE CRIMINAL TRIAL ATTORNEY CERTIFICATION, NO ASPECT OF THIS ADVERTISEMENT HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY

en English
en Englishes Spanish