Municipal Court Diversion Programs (Part 4)

by | Feb 3, 2016 | Blog, Criminal Law, News

(2) Nothing in this act shall preclude a defendant charged with any disorderly persons offense or petty disorderly persons offense under chapter 35 or 36 of Title 2C from applying to the court for admission into the conditional discharge program in accordance with N.J.S. 2C:36A-1.

In addition to the eligibility criteria enumerated in this section, the court shall consider the following factors:

 

(1) The nature and circumstances of the offense;

(2) The facts surrounding the commission of the offense;

(3) The motivation, age, character and attitude of the defendant;

(4) The desire of the complainant or victim to forgo prosecution;

(5) The needs and interests of the victim and the community;

(6) The extent to which the defendant’s offense constitutes part of a continuing pattern of anti-social behavior;

(7) Whether the offense is of an assaultive or violent nature, whether in the act itself or in the possible injurious consequences of such behavior;

(8) Whether the applicant’s participation will adversely affect the prosecution of codefendants;

(9) Whether diversion of the defendant from prosecution is consistent with the public interest; and

(10) Any other factors deemed relevant by the court.

 

Note that the ten factors in section c are modeled off of the superior court’s PTI eligibility criteria. However, as a practical matter, they will rarely be considered because municipal courts do not have the superior court’s resources. Thus, while a probation officer conducts a background interview and research regarding defendants seeking PTI acceptance, no such interview or research occurs at the municipal court level. Thus, defendants who are not precluded by the criteria in sub-section b will by and large be accepted to the conditional dismissal program.

Program participants will be under probation monitoring for one year and be subject to monetary obligations and may be subject to other conditions imposed by the court.
While the prosecutor has notice of the application, an opportunity to object and the right to appeal, discretion as to granting an application is the court’s. Presumably, the standard on appeal is the same as that for any other sentencing decision by a court, not the “abuse of discretion” standard in PTI appeals.

2C:43-13.4. Violation of Terms Prior to Dismissal. Violation of Terms Prior To Dismissal. If a defendant who is participating in the conditional dismissal program is convicted of any petty disorderly persons offense, disorderly persons offense or crime under any law of the United States, this State or any other state, or otherwise fails to comply with the terms and conditions imposed by the court, the court may enter a judgment of conviction and impose a fine, penalty, or other assessment which may be imposed by the court in accordance with the defendant’s prior plea of guilty or finding of guilt.

Excellent rating
Based on 288 reviews
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred was excellent and helped my son deal with a issue in PPB, despite being a long distance away. He is very thorough and knows how to navigate the ins and outs of the local legal waters.
Bruces
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
always feel better knowing I don't need to be stopped when I haven't done anything wrong it's a great service and gives me peace of mint
Liesel T
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Called back within 10 minutes,very easy to talk to. Not judgmental at all. I am hopeful about the outcome.
Colleen H
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fantastic lawyer, I had two charges that were thankfully dropped thanks to Fred. If you're looking for a great lawyer, Fred Sisto is the guy to call. 5 stars. Thank you Fred Sisto.
Dan M
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I called Mr. Sisto a few weeks back and he returned the call immediately! I asked a few questions and he clearly explained the options for one of my employees. He then followed up with a detailed proposal. He was completely knowledgeable, helpful and insightful. If I ever had to use him I would feel VERY comfortable with his representation.
Dave P
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred sisto was an absolute life saver in my case I would recommend him to anyone in the future if needed.
Nelson C
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Great that Fred posts DUI for Monmouth County!
David F
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I recently retained Mr. Fred Sisto to represent my son regarding a very serious legal matter. If not handled correctly these charges could have resulted in bad consequences for my son's future prospects. Mr. Sisto's knowledge of the criminal justice system is evident since he was able to get all charges dropped as well as getting them expunged from his record. If you need a criminal justice attorney who will respond quickly to all your questions and concern,as well as achieve a satisfactory solution to your case I strongly recommend Attorney Fred Sisto.
Joseph M
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
That’s my lawyer he’s the greatest
Donald J
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred was incredibly helpful during a very stressful time. Even during a pandemic he was fast at responding to any and all questions or problems that I had. He went above and beyond to make sure that I was happy with my results and that my case was being handled properly all the way through. Highly recommend this office!
Toni V