AG Modifications To CJ Reform Policies: Part 2

by | Nov 10, 2017 | Blog, Criminal Law, New Jersey

Anti-Drug ProfiteeringThe second change to the Attorney General’s Directive involved changing all references to the “Risk Assessment” tools to refer to them as “Public Safety Assessment” tools. This change is reminiscent of the “new speak” referenced in George Orwell’s famous novel, 1984. The novel referred to the power of language and the Government’s tendency to replace certain words or phrases to achieve their ends. George Carlin touched on the theme as well in one of his classic stand-up bits. Examples include: referring to the deaths of innocent civilians in wartime as “collateral damage” and referring to being shell-shocked as “suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder.”

Here the Government’s alleged concern for “public safety” as opposed to “risk” is almost certainly intended to influence courts to detain pretrial or to impose onerous pretrial conditions on defendants who are released. Otherwise, we are made to believe that the safety of the public will be endangered.

The third change added the following section regarding Domestic Violence cases:

4.2.l.b Ontario Domestic Assault Risk Assessment Score Values.

In addition to the PSA, police officers are required in certain domestic violence cases to complete the Ontario Domestic Assault Risk Assessment (ODARA utilizing a Scoring Form, which has been prescribed by the Director of the Division of Criminal Justice. See Section 4.6 (discussing ODARA in depth). Unlike the PSA, which is an automated process, the ODARA is administered “manually” by law enforcement officers through an interview with the victim and/or others and a review of the defendant’s criminal history and related records (e.g., prior police reports, Computer Aided Dispatch reports, etc.).

The ODARA assessment is comprised of 13 separate items including, among others, the victim’s concern for future assault, whether there are children in the relationship, whether the victim was pregnant during an assault, substance use by either party, and domestic and non-domestic criminal history of the arrestee. Each item is scored using a “1” fora “yes” response and a “0” for a “no” response. The raw score is the sum of the items, which ranges from 0 to 13.

Excellent rating
Based on 288 reviews
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I highly recommend Fred. He is very knowledgeable and will look out for your interest. I am happy with the outcome of my case. I hope I don’t have to use his services again but if I did I will definitely use him again. He also has a great personality and is very personable. That’s always a plus!
Mohammad J
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Even though I didn't end up using Fred; I had the best experience from him out of anyone I called for a consultation. He was very clear and consise, made sure I understood my options for the situation I was faced with. He ultimately gave me the confidence to go to court pro se for my case. I also get weekly emails now that are extremely helpful and include a wealth of information for goings on around my area.
Warren C
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Current Pre law students and I had a question pertaining to a certain scenario in class. He responded back and gave me a case that broke down exactly what I asked for.
Chad T
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred Sisto is a consummate professional, who attended to my case with the utmost attention to detail. Without his direction and handling I do not believe it would have been possible for me to have such a favorable outcome.
Timothy A
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Not to long ago I ran into a very serious legal issue for the first time in my life, I'm closing in on 60. Needless to say I was unsure of the process. I was fortunate that a friend recommended Fred. Fred handled my case in a professional and courteous manner yet was very down to earth and straight forward. It took nearly 9 month to resolve and during that time Fred was always available to answer questions, explain the process and most of all alleviate my stress. I feel we got the best possible outcome and I would highly recommend Fred to anyone facing a legal/criminal matter
Manny P
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I called Mr. Sisto a few weeks back and he returned the call immediately! I asked a few questions and he clearly explained the options for one of my employees. He then followed up with a detailed proposal. He was completely knowledgeable, helpful and insightful. If I ever had to use him I would feel VERY comfortable with his representation.
Dave P
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred is a good attorney because he is available 24-7 & always returned my calls..he makes your day in court brief so your not sitting in court all day.
Karen P
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Great Guy, would recommend him!
Adam W
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred Sisto is amazing!! Definitely recommend
Jen A
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred is a detail minded attorney that works tirelessly to get the job done right. If you need help Fred knows how to take care of your issues. Fred has years of experience and will work hard for justice for his clients. Fred is easy to talk to and has great communication skills!
Gibson H