Bail Reform: Police Officer’s Charging Decision Process

by | Nov 29, 2016 | Blog, Criminal Law, Law Reform and Amendments

“Subject to the limitations set forth in subsection 3.3.1,the directive may provide for the special designation of supervisory officers who are authorized by the County Prosecutor to approve issuance of a complaint-summons notwithstanding that this Directive establishes a presumption that a complaint-warrant will be sought, and/or who are authorized by the County Prosecutor to approve an application for a complaint-warrant notwithstanding that this Directive establishes a presumption that a complaint-summons will be issued, provided that the County Prosecutor determines that such delegation of prosecutorial authority is necessary to prevent the prosecutor’s office from being overburdened by charging consultations. In other words, a County Prosecutor may authorize specially selected designated supervisory officers to overcome presumptions under Section 4 of this Directive, provided, however, that if the County Prosecutor’s directive authorizes anyone other than an assistant prosecutor to overcome a presumption, the directive shall require that the prosecutor’s office be notified  at the time of the charging decision that the decision had been made by a specially-designated supervisory officer to overcome a presumption. Such notification may be made by communicating telephonically with the on-call duty assistant prosecutor, or by sending an email to the on-call duty assistant prosecutor or other designated person or email address in the prosecutor ‘s office, as shall be specified in the County Prosecutor’s directive.”

This process seems to undermine the alleged rationale for the delegation of legal advice and charging decisions to non-lawyers, that being a lack of manpower in a county prosecutor’s office. If an on-call assistant prosecutor or other designated employee of the county prosecutor’s office still has to be notified about the supervising police officer’s charging decision, it stands to reason that very little time would be saved and the on-call assistant prosecutor should be the one giving the legal advice and making the charging decision in the first place.

Excellent rating
Based on 288 reviews
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
My boyfriend used Fred Sisto twice and had nothing but positive results. Fred was professional, courteous, and punctual. His office was also very attentive and understanding when he had to speak with them regarding his case. I would recommend using Fred to anyone in the monmouth or ocean county region if they had any criminal case regarding the possession of marijuana
C
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
....and his Dog Gonzo is a great attorney.
Duane H
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I am writing to share my experience working with Fred From the very beginning, he provided outstanding service and demonstrated a high level of professionalism. He was attentive to my needs, communicated clearly, and always made sure I understood each step of the process. What impressed me most was his efficiency—he handled my case quickly without compromising on quality. His dedication and expertise gave me confidence and peace of mind throughout the entire process. I highly recommend Fred to anyone seeking reliable and effective legal support. His commitment to his clients and ability to deliver results promptly truly set him apart.
Aida F
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I am thankful and fortunate to have had Fred represent me as counsel. His expertise, responsiveness and professionalism are second to none. I was more than satisfied with the outcome of my case and the level of service Fred's practice provided.
John M
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Excellent advice. Clam and accretive. Handled my case professionally and efficiently. Thank you for the great service. -D.
Danni K
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
My charges were dismissed and he quickly got an expungement for me. He's worth way more than what I paid for. I will always be grateful. He never missed a single call, text or email from me. He also keeps me informed of all checkpoints
Bre D
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Very professional, always available to answer any questions I had. Plus, I didn't lose my license all thanks to him. Great lawyer overall
David B
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred is knowledgeable and he has great working relationships with the courts. He HONESTLY is seeking the best deal for you he is not all about the money!! Thanks Fred you saved me BIG TIME!!
Casey B
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Very good
Nazario B
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred Sisto handled my case very well. I was happy with outcome. I wouldn't hesitate to recommend him to any of my friends or family.
David V