Harassment and Protected Speech (Part 3)

by | Nov 6, 2023 | Blog, Criminal Law, Monmouth County, New Jersey, Ocean County

The Appellate Division continued in relevant part: Because calls to exhort social pressure on plaintiff would necessarily fall under the aegis of First Amendment protection and the specter of imprisonment for refusing a get is unrealistic, harassment must be found–if at all–in the threat of violence. However, the judge’s conclusion that such threats were real and imminent is simply not supported by the record. First Amendment protections cannot be vitiated on unsubstantiated findings of fact. The video itself, which was not even directed to plaintiff, contained no overt call for or reference to violence. See Carroll (citing United States v. Dinwiddie, 76 F. 3d 913, 925 (8th Cir. 1996)) (listing “whether the threat was communicated directly to its victim” as among the indicia of a “true threat”). Even an overt invocation of violence, however, would be insufficient to strip the statement of First Amendment protection. See Claiborne Hardware Co., 458 U.S. at 902; Brandenburg, 395 U.S. at 446-47.

Instead, to qualify as incitement and lose First Amendment protection–as the judge tacitly found–a communication must be both “directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and likely to incite or produce such action.” Brandenburg, 395 U.S. at 447. However, such is not the case on this record. The difference between lawful and lawless action “may be identified easily by reference to its purpose.” Claiborne Hardware Co., 458 U.S. at 933. Defendant’s ultimate objective was unquestionably legitimate–it was to get a get. We are persuaded that under the circumstances of this case, the means employed by defendant to achieve her goal is entitled to First Amendment protection.

The plaintiff could argue that many unlawful threats are grounded in a legitimate objective. For example, a defendant could have a valid civil judgment requiring that the opposing party pay them a sum of money. Still, the defendant is not protected from criminal charges if he communicates that he will have the opposing party assaulted if they do not make the payment.

Excellent rating
Based on 288 reviews
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I was very fortunate to find Attorney Fred Sisto for my legal case in Ocean County, NJ. He was thoroughly versed in the law and kept me informed at all times. When it came time for my court date, he showed up early and clearly advised me of all possible options. I could not be happier with the outcome Fred was able to negotiate for me. I highly recommend him!
Kelly L
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred is the best! He is extremely professional and kept constant contact so I was always in the loop. My charges got dismissed and I couldn't be happier. Would highly recommend!
Ryan T
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
The Best To Ever Do It :)
Sergio A
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Spot on, 100%
Earl M
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Very knowledgeable within every aspect of the law. Highly recommend his talent for your criminal defense.
Will S
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Muy buen abogado lo rrecomiendo!!
Victor N
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred is a good lawyer, he is really young yet made me feel confident that my lawful rights were being protected, and investigated all avenues when there was potential they weren't. He is very knowledgeable, and offered great peace of mind in such a distressing situation. I always felt like he had my back throughout the whole process, supporting aspects to my case that didn't even fall within his scope. I would highly recommend Fred.
Amy L
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I think Fred's alerts are a great service to his audience and a very smart marketing tool. Keep up the good work, Fred.
Charles O
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Very professional and knowledgeable, also awesome communication and very down to earth guy. Would highly recommend to anyone. Matter was resolved with the best possible outcome that I could've hoped.
Mike A
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
My boyfriend used Fred Sisto twice and had nothing but positive results. Fred was professional, courteous, and punctual. His office was also very attentive and understanding when he had to speak with them regarding his case. I would recommend using Fred to anyone in the monmouth or ocean county region if they had any criminal case regarding the possession of marijuana
C