Megan’s Law Termination (Part 1)

by | Jun 1, 2020 | Blog, Criminal Law, Monmouth County, New Jersey, Ocean County

On March 17, 2020, the New Jersey Supreme Court decided the Essex County case of In the Matter of Registrant H.D. The principal issue under N.J.S.A. 2C:7-2 involved the circumstances in which a sex offender can be forever barred from seeking termination of Megan’s Law requirements.

Justice Solomon wrote for the Court in relevant part: Reading subsection (f) as part of N.J.S.A. 2C:7-2, we find its language unambiguous. It plainly refers to the conviction or release that triggers the registration requirement established in subsection (b) and detailed in subsection (c). The mechanism for registration relief set forth in subsection (f) is linked both by logic and by language to the initial mandate of registration which stems from a conviction for certain offenses. See N.J.S.A. 2C:7-2(b)(1) to (3). Aside from those required to register on the basis of a conviction that predates the effective date of Megan’s Law, N.J.S.A. 2C:7-2(c)(4), the mandate commences upon conviction of a predicate offense for those “under supervision in the community on probation, parole, furlough, work release, or a similar program,” N.J.S.A. 2C:7-2(c)(1), or upon release from confinement, N.J.S.A. 2C:7-2(c)(2). Like subsection (c), subsection (f) begins with a reference to individuals “required to register under this act,” and reuses the terms “conviction” and “release” that start the registration process under subsection (c). In doing so, the Legislature tethered the registration relief offered in subsection (f) to the same underlying sex offense that marked the starting point of the registration requirement.

The registrants’ reliance on the word “any” is misplaced. N.J.S.A. 2C:7-2 applies to a variety of sex offenses, and sentences upon conviction for Megan’s Law offenses vary from supervised release to confinement in a correctional facility. See N.J.S.A. 2C:7-2(c)(1) to (2). “Any” also acknowledges that not all sentences of imprisonment will be the same and makes it clear that the fifteen-year clock will not start until release, no matter how long or short the period of imprisonment. The word thus has meaning within the context of N.J.S.A. 2C:7-2 If the statute read “within 15 years following any conviction or release,” the registrants might have a stronger argument.

“Release” from prison starts the clock because it is rare for inmates to be convicted of criminal offenses while incarcerated. While crimes occur all the time in the prison system, assaults that do not result in serious bodily injury tend to be punished with administrative sanctions as opposed to criminal charges.

Excellent rating
Based on 288 reviews
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred is a good lawyer, he is really young yet made me feel confident that my lawful rights were being protected, and investigated all avenues when there was potential they weren't. He is very knowledgeable, and offered great peace of mind in such a distressing situation. I always felt like he had my back throughout the whole process, supporting aspects to my case that didn't even fall within his scope. I would highly recommend Fred.
Amy L
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Using Fredrick Sisto for my attorney was a great experience. He was very easy to understand and work with. Also very good at his job and hard working. I would recommend to anyone who is seeking an attorney!
Thomas L
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Very informative.
Patrick S
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred is the absolute BEST out there!! My experience with him was great he walked me thru everything and got my charges dropped!!!!!
Kat M
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Thanks for sharing this information.
Joe F
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I was very pleased with my representation by Fred Sisto. He is very honest and explained everything to me in detail. I would recommend him to anybody who is seeking legal representation..
Jeff M
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Mr. Fred Sisto handled a case regarding my business. He was always available to answer my calls directly and helped me with any questions I had. He also had the case dismissed before I was even able to make it to the court room! I know it can be difficult when finding an attorney but I know I made no mistake choosing the law offices of Frederick Sisto, I highly recommend him!!
Kari J
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred, Thank you for the notifications on the DUI stops.
Joe F
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Great!!! , got my case handled in the exact manner that I was told and would recommend to everyone else in need of legal representation .
Raumelis R
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred's services has been more than exceptional. He provided updates on my case. He got me one of the best outcomes i could have asked for, and has represented me twice with amazing results. Fred can work his magic on your case just as he did for me
Chris K