Opening Statements and Jury Instructions (Part 6)

by | Dec 17, 2020 | Blog, Criminal Law, Monmouth County, New Jersey, Ocean County

The New Jersey Supreme Court concluded with the following in relevant part: The Court reviews the evidence presented and stresses that the State’s case against Greene was far from overwhelming. The Court also notes that counsel’s participation in requesting and crafting the curative instruction does not make the defense complicit in inviting or acquiescing in an error — the prosecutor’s opening. Counsel could have and should have sought a mistrial if they believed that their clients had suffered irremediable prejudice after Smith refused to testify. The Court does not encourage counsel to delay seeking relief until after the jury returns a verdict. That form of strategic gamble may backfire and is not condoned.

In Greene’s case, however, even in the absence of a request for a mistrial, he was denied the fair trial guaranteed to him by the Federal and State Constitutions. Lewis stands in a different position from Greene. His name was not mentioned in the prosecutor’s remarks concerning Smith’s expected testimony, and the State’s case against Lewis included his DNA and the victim’s blood on the baseball hat left at the scene — the hat that A.J. testified Lewis wore on the night of the home invasion. The prosecutor’s opening did not deny Lewis his right to a fair trial. As to Greene, the Appellate Division is affirmed and the case is remanded for a new trial. As to Lewis, the Appellate Division is reversed and the matter is remanded to them for consideration of Lewis’s other appellate arguments.

Here, the Court is likely responding to the appellate prosecutor’s argument that Smith’s attorney’s failure to move for a mistrial should foreclose his appellate arguments for reversal. Had the appellate prosecutor’s argument been accepted, Smith would have to pursue post-conviction relief as a means to reverse his conviction. An interesting issue after the remands will be whether Greene chooses to offer testimony against Smith now that Smith’s position has improved with the reversal and Greene’s has gotten worse with the appellate remand.

Excellent rating
Based on 288 reviews
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Mr. Sisto is very knowledgeable in the specific area of which he practices. I was beyond thankful for the end results of which could not have been achieved without Mr. Sisto's intervention.
Shawn H
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred is an excellent attorney. Even though we did not initiate the official pleading process, he deep dived into researching and sorted out my questions without any consultation fee. I highly recommend him!
Qianru Z
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I recently retained Mr. Fred Sisto to represent my son regarding a very serious legal matter. If not handled correctly these charges could have resulted in bad consequences for my son's future prospects. Mr. Sisto's knowledge of the criminal justice system is evident since he was able to get all charges dropped as well as getting them expunged from his record. If you need a criminal justice attorney who will respond quickly to all your questions and concern,as well as achieve a satisfactory solution to your case I strongly recommend Attorney Fred Sisto.
Joseph M
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred is a very knowledgeable and effective attorney. His knowledge of the law enables him to understand your issue, plan a strategy to address it and explain the strategy to you. He also possesses excellent communication skills that assist him interactions with other attorneys and judges.
Michael G
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Called back within 10 minutes,very easy to talk to. Not judgmental at all. I am hopeful about the outcome.
Colleen H
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred Sisto is compassionate! His forewarning his network about DUI checkpoints are vital to public interests! He does what it NEEDED by giving us advanced notifications about avoiding situations! Thank you Fred!
Joseph R
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I was very content with Fred’s services. He was extremely communicative throughout the entire process and I am happy with our results.
Lidia D
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I wholeheartedly recommend the legal services of Frederick Sisto. Mr. Sisto brings with him a wealth of knowledge, experience, and professionalism - qualities that make him highly effective at providing legal counsel.
John D
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Great attorney, responded very quickly to our emails and calls. The office staff is attentive and knowledgeable as well. Over all a great experience. Highly recommend him.
Alexandra L
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred Sisto is amazing!! Definitely recommend
Jen A