Fred Sisto | Criminal Attorney | Ocean and Monmouth County

Call Us Today
732-898-3232

  • Home
  • Criminal Defense Services
    ▼
    • Drug Crimes
      ▼
      • Drug Manufacturing
      • Intent to Distribute Narcotics
      • Prescription Drug Crimes
      • Leader of Narcotics Trafficking Network
    • Weapons Charges
      ▼
      • Prohibited Weapons and Devices
      • Manufacture, Transport, etc. of Weapons
      • Illegal Possession of a Gun
      • Possession of Weapons for Unlawful Purposes
    • Expungements
    • Theft Attorney
    • Violent Crimes
      ▼
      • Robbery/Burglary
      • Manslaughter
      • Extortion
      • Assault
      • Sexual Offenses
    • Arson
    • DUI / DWI
      ▼
      • Alcohol DUI
      • Drug DUI
      • Refusing a Breath Test
    • Driving with A Suspended License
    • Property Forfeiture
    • Anti-Drug Profiteering
    • Juvenile Delinquency
  • Español / Spanish Speaking Attorney
  • About
    ▼
    • Testimonials
    • Defending Cases In
      ▼
      • Monmouth County
      • Ocean County
  • Blog
  • Contact
    ▼
    • Receive a Call From Fred
  • DUI Checkpoint Alerts
  • Results
  • Payment Options
  • Home
  • Criminal Defense Services
    • Drug Crimes
      • Drug Manufacturing
      • Intent to Distribute Narcotics
      • Prescription Drug Crimes
      • Leader of Narcotics Trafficking Network
    • Weapons Charges
      • Prohibited Weapons and Devices
      • Manufacture, Transport, etc. of Weapons
      • Illegal Possession of a Gun
      • Possession of Weapons for Unlawful Purposes
    • Expungements
    • Theft Attorney
    • Violent Crimes
      • Robbery/Burglary
      • Manslaughter
      • Extortion
      • Assault
      • Sexual Offenses
    • Arson
    • DUI / DWI
      • Alcohol DUI
      • Drug DUI
      • Refusing a Breath Test
    • Driving with A Suspended License
    • Property Forfeiture
    • Anti-Drug Profiteering
    • Juvenile Delinquency
  • Español / Spanish Speaking Attorney
  • About
    • Testimonials
    • Defending Cases In
      • Monmouth County
      • Ocean County
  • Blog
  • Contact
    • Receive a Call From Fred
  • DUI Checkpoint Alerts
  • Results
  • Payment Options
Home >> Sentencing Downgrade (Part 2) – Mentally Handicapped

January 6, 2016 by Fred Sisto

Sentencing Downgrade (Part 2) – Mentally Handicapped

Additionally, the two statutes address two qualitatively different criminal law situations. Id. 2C :44-l(d) governs imprisonment versus non-imprisonment, a more serious condition, while section 2C :44-lf(2) governs whether or not a defendant convicted of a crime should be sentenced as if convicted of a crime one degree lower. Id. This means that a first or second-degree conviction that is downgraded under the “serious injustice” standard, can be the basis for a sentence of probation with no jail time. On the other hand, a sentence that is downgraded under the “in the interest of justice” standard, must still call for a prison term, albeit for a term of years that is consistent with a crime that is one degree lower than the crime at issue. Thus, a first-degree sentence that is downgraded under the interest of justice standard will fall within the 5 to 10 year prison term range as opposed to the standard 10 to 20 year term. A second-degree sense that is downgraded under the interest of justice standard protocol for a 3 to 5 year prison term, as opposed to 5 to 10 years.

Note the criminal code does not allow for third-degree sentences to be downgraded to the fourth degree sentencing hearing. See 2C :44-lf(2). This prohibition does not have much of a practical effect since every few third or fourth degree criminal law convictions call for mandatory prison time. Therefore, probation without jail time can almost always be given for third or fourth degree offenses without resort to our criminal code’s sentencing downgrade provisions.

Returning to those very rare criminal law cases where the “serious injustice” standard has been held to justify probationary sentences for first and second degree offenders, in State v . Jarbath, 114 N.J. 394 (1989), the twenty-one year old defendant who was mentally retarded and diagnosed as psychotic was charged with the knowing murder of her nineteen-day-old son. Id. at 398. In finding that it would be a “serious injustice” to imprison Jarbath, the Court concluded that as long as she was not a danger to the community and could get adequate care through placement in supervised educational, vocational, and recreational programs, prison was not the appropriate setting for her. Jarbath, at 399. Accordingly, the Appellate Division re-sentenced defendant as a third-degree offender to a five-year probationary term conditioned on: (1) receipt of psychiatric care; (2) participation in an Association of Retarded Citizens Program; (3) regular reporting to the Probation Department; (4) residence with family members; and (5) not living with any child under five years of age in the same house. Id.

In Jarbath, the Appellate Division disagreed with the trial court ‘s determination and reasoning with respect to the existence as well as the balancing of aggravating and mitigating factors. Id. at 403. The Appellate Court found that there was a “lack of any aggravating factors” and instead, the presence of “extreme mitigating factors”, in particular, factors (2), (4), (7), (8), and (9). Id.      It then determined that these mitigating factors militated in favor of downgrading the offense and imposing a non-custodial term. Id. The Supreme Court concurred in the conclusion of the Appellate Division. Id. at 404. The New Jersey Supreme Court concluded that, in sum, as determined by the Appellate Division, the “serious injustice”of imprisonment under Jarbath’s circumstances clearly outweighs the needs of general deterrence. Id. at 409.

Filed Under: Blog, Criminal Law, Jail Time and Probation

Testimonials

Fred is a stickler for detail and communicates with clients very, very well. He is smart and astute. I would recommend him unconditionally.

Tom O   

I would highly recommend Mr. Sisto. He is very insightful and proficient, yet still down to Earth. Fred is great at communicating and breaking down the facts. But most importantly, he excels at getting results.

Bill K   

Thanks to Fred I have no criminal record whatsoever.

Luke A   

Great!!! , got my case handled in the exact manner that I was told and would recommend to everyone else in need of legal representation.

Raumelis R   
See More Testimonials

Recent Posts

  • Plea Agreements and New Charges (Part 2)
  • Plea Agreements and New Charges (Part 1)
  • Youth and Withholding Imprisonment (Part 2)
  • Youth and Withholding Imprisonment (Part 1)
  • Marijuana and Diversionary Programs (Part 4)
  • Marijuana and Diversionary Programs (Part 3)
  • Marijuana and Diversionary Programs (Part 2)
  • Marijuana and Diversionary Programs (Part 1)

Recent Speaking Engagement

Site Disclaimer

Attorney Referral Fees

Frederick P Sisto has earned Lawyer Legion's recognition for Community Leadership
 
Top Criminal Defense Attorney in Brick

Law Office of Frederick P. Sisto

Point Pleasant Office*:
302 Hawthorne Ave, Suite 1
Point Pleasant Beach, NJ 08742

Brick Township Office*:
223 Drum Point Road, Suite 1
Brick Township, NJ 08723

Sea Girt Office*:
2150 NJ-35,
Suite 225
Sea Girt, NJ 08750

Phone: 732-898-3232
Fax: 201-508-3393
*Office visits by appointment only.

Representing clients throughout all court jurisdictions of New Jersey.

WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE CRIMINAL TRIAL ATTORNEY CERTIFICATION, NO ASPECT OF THIS ADVERTISEMENT HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY

en English
en Englishes Spanish