Your Rights During a Motor Vehicle Stop

by | Sep 15, 2015 | Blog, Criminal Law, Know Your Rights, Traffic Stops

If you are stopped by an officer in Ocean or Monmouth County and he/she asks if they can search your vehicle, do you know your rights?  Do you know what happens next if you say no?  Do you know if the officer has a right at any point to search your vehicle without your consent?  Knowing the answers to these questions can be the difference between getting to your destination on time or sitting on the side of the road for a long period of time while officers search through your entire vehicle and its contents.

 

What are your rights?

During the time of the stop, you still have your right to privacy under both the state and federal constitution.

However, there are two main ways an officer can gather evidence to declare a “warrant exception” during the time of the stop.  The first warrant exception is “plain view.”  If the officer can identify any illegal item or substance such as a weapon, drugs, drug paraphernalia, etc. while only looking into the vehicle, then he/she can search your car without a warrant.  Falling under the “plain view” doctrine is the concept of “plain smell.”  If the officer can smell contraband (usually marijuana) at the time of the stop, then probable cause is established and he/she may be able to search the car without a warrant if he/she can also establish exigent circumstances..

In both of these situations, the officer must see or smell the illegal substance during the stop and cannot have prior knowledge of the substance’s presence in the vehicle.   Fred Sisto had evidence thrown out in a case where the officers attempted to use the plain view doctrine notwithstanding their prior knowledge of the evidence’s location.

The second most common warrant exception is consent.  If the officer cannot gather enough evidence for a warrant exception during the time of the stop, then he can ask you for consent.  If you allow the officer to search your vehicle, then he has obtained a warrant exception.

However, this can be contested in court due to a ruling in 2002 which declared that the driver could feel pressured or obligated to allow the officer to search the vehicle.

Will saying no provide enough suspicion to allow the officer to search the vehicle?

Saying no can not legally raise suspicion.  Also, without reasonable suspicion to briefly detain or probable cause to arrest you, the officer cannot keep you at the stop until he/she obtains a warrant.

Excellent rating
Based on 288 reviews
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred was incredibly helpful during a very stressful time. Even during a pandemic he was fast at responding to any and all questions or problems that I had. He went above and beyond to make sure that I was happy with my results and that my case was being handled properly all the way through. Highly recommend this office!
Toni V
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Muy buen abogado lo rrecomiendo!!
Victor N
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Iv had good lawyers defend me before but Mr.Sisto is beyond the best iv had. He explains everything every step of the way until your court date and excels on getting results , I defenatly recomend his services.
Imer J
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred was extremely helpful and knowledgable. He made the whole process as painless and easy as possible.
Toli C
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Today my life was about to change! With great communication and excellent service he was able to create the impossible!! I am now able to continue to drive for a living!! I highly recommend his services and trust his judgment-HE KNOWS HIS STUFF!!! He saved my life and livelihood today! Mr.Frank Sisto is an absolutely amazing attorney! Thank you again I’ll never forget this day! God Bless
Edward J
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred is a fantastic attorney who is very informative, knows the system well, and is very thorough.
Bob V
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred Sisto's attention to detail, his representation and unwavering advocacy for me made all the difference in my case.
Jill F
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred is an excellent attorney. Even though we did not initiate the official pleading process, he deep dived into researching and sorted out my questions without any consultation fee. I highly recommend him!
Qianru Z
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I have sought out Mr. Sisto for two traffic related cases. His hard work and dedication to getting results for me was very evident from the get go. He was very informative throughout the entire process of working on my cases and during the court sessions as well. Very professional and very friendly. If anyone in the area is looking for a very good and quality representation, Mr. Sisto is a go to.
Brett S
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred Sisto is a professional, knowledgeable, and exceptional attorney. He is very responsive and maintains continuous contact with his clients via phone and email. Fred made sure that we understood the charges and was able to work on getting us the best outcome possible. He even went above and beyond in the court room by assisting with translation from English to Spanish. I highly recommend him to anyone who is in need of legal services and representation. In the future if needed I would definitely use him again as an attorney.
Sara A