The Supreme Court continued in relevant part: In Fitzgerald, for instance, the Court concluded that a former President is entitled to absolute immunity from “damages liability for acts within the ‘outer perimeter’ of his official responsibility.” Id., at 756. The...
Chief Justice Roberts continued in relevant part: Article II of the Constitution vests “executive Power” in “a President of the United States of America.” §1, cl. 1. The President has duties of “unrivaled gravity and breadth.” Trump v. Vance, 591 U. S. 786, 800. His...
On July 1, 2024, the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Trump v. United States. The principal issue concerned the nature and scope of presidential immunity from criminal prosecutions. Chief Justice Roberts wrote for the 6-3 majority in relevant part: A...
On July 1, 2024, the New Jersey Supreme Court decided the Monmouth County case of IMO Registrant J.A. The principal issue before the Court under N.J.S.A. 2C:7-2 concerned the standard for Megan’s Law registration termination for juveniles. The unanimous per curiam...
The New Jersey Supreme Court continued in relevant part: In In re Registrant H.D., the Court held that individuals who apply to terminate their Megan's Law requirements must demonstrate they have been offense-free for fifteen years from the time of conviction for...
On July 1, 2024, the New Jersey Supreme Court decided the Camden County case of IMO Registrant R.H. The principal issue under N.J.S.A. 2C:7-2 concerned whether the fifteen-year offense-free requirement for Megan’s Law termination applies to juveniles who were...
Justice Gorsuch concluded with the following in relevant part: Amicus next turns to the Double Jeopardy Clause, which permits a judge to look into a defendant’s past conduct to ask whether the government has charged a defendant for the same crime a second time. While...
The United States Supreme Court majority continued in relevant part: To answer such questions, a court will sometimes consult the Shepard documents in a case, which include judicial records, plea agreements, and colloquies between a judge and the defendant. See...
Justice Gorsuch continued in relevant part: The government concedes what all of this means for Mr. Erlinger. To trigger ACCA’s mandatory minimum, the government had to prove, among other things, that his three predicate convictions were “committed on occasions...
The Supreme Court majority continued in relevant part: On appeal, the government confessed error. Pointing to this Court’s recent decision in Wooden v. United States, 595 U. S. 360, which acknowledged that an ACCA “occasions inquiry” can be intensely factual in...